Les sources iconographiques
des portraits fictifs du père jésuite Jacques Marquette |
1894 Leopold Bracony
Leopold Bracony a présenté cette maquette au concours organisé par l'État du Wisconsin, en 1894, visant à sélectionner la sculpture de Marquette qui représenterait cet État dans le Hall of the House of Representatives du Capitol, tel que décidé par le Congrès en 1864. Elle est donc forcément moins connue et imitée que l'oeuvre qui a gagné ce concours, celle de 1896 Trentanove. La représentation de Marquette y est fort intéressante et originale, plus discrète, délicate et maniérée que celle de Trentanove, éléments qui ont probablement joué en sa défaveur, car convenant davantage à un art décoratif d'intérieur domestique qu'à une grande sculpture historique d'art public visant à soulever les passions. La posture est animée dans l'espace, par un léger contrapposto, par l'aristocratique regard oblique, les positions variées des bras et l'important mouvement du drapé évoquant un patricien romain. Marquette tient sa carte dans sa main gauche. Son visage est d'âge moyen et glabre. Il présente un début de calvitie, arborant une houppe sur le devant de la tête, motif qui sera utilisé par quelques artistes. L'État du Wisconsin a procrastiné 23 longues années avant de sélectionner le personnage historique devant les représenter au Capitol. Le choix de Marquette, en 1887, a soulevé des passions politiques et religieuses dont Cronon 1973 donne un compte-rendu détaillé (voir pdf). Nous en avons extrait, ci-dessous, les éléments relatifs au concours organisé en 1894. Leopold Bracony est né à Rome. Il a habité et exposé à Paris.
« Briefly active in Canton (Stark) [Ohio] in late 1896 or early 1897; he was called there to execute a bust of Mrs. William McKinley, shortly before the President's inauguration. Bracony was living in New York City around 1915 (Weidman 2000, web p. 108). » Leopold Bracony (1875-1915-), Jacques Marquette, 1894, Plaster, 73cm x 38cm x 23cm (28 3/4" x 14 15/16" x 9 1/16"), Wisconsin Historical Society (officially the State Historical Society of Wisconsin), 1967.496, source. Photo source : Cronon 1973. |
Extracts from Cronon 1973 relating to Father Marquette goes to Washington, The Marquette Statue Controversy. In 1864 Congress decided to turn the old Hall of the House of Representatives in the newly enlarged national Capitol into a Statuary Hall to honor a select group of distinguished Americans. The President was accordingly authorized to invite each state to provide statues "in marble or bronze, not exceeding two in number for each state, of deceased persons, who have been citizens thereof, and illustrious for their historic renown, or from distinguished civic or military services, such as each state shall determine to be worthy of this national commemoration." Indeed, it was not until 1887 that the legislature gave serious consideration to the matter of placing a Wisconsin statue in the national Capitol. In January of that year Senator George C. Ginty, a Republican newspaper editor from Chippewa Falls, introduced a bill proposing that the state honor Father Marquette by placing his statue in Washington. Ginty's motives were not clear. He may simply have reasoned that the intrepid and saintly Marquette was Wisconsin's strongest contender for the honor, for as he told the senate, "if ever an unselfish man walked the earth, it was the missionary who planted the cross on the shores of Lake Superior in the latter half of the sixteenth [sic] century." Or, as some observers pointed out, he may have hoped that this gesture would both please his numerous constituents of French Canadian descent and attract broader Catholic support for his as yet unfulfilled gubernatorial ambitions. In Wisconsin Governor Peck proved to be in no hurry to provide a statue. Not until July of 1894 did he appoint a commission to select a sculptor, and then only after the major English-language Catholic paper of the state, the Milwaukee Catholic Citizen, began regularly publishing the number of weeks remaining in Peck's term and pointedly asking when he was going to do something about Father Marquette's statue. In contrast to earlier delays, the commission moved swiftly to discharge its assignment. Promptly announcing a nationwide competition, it invited artists "at their own expense, to furnish models, drawings and full information in detail" for judging on October 15, 1894. The commission specified that the statue "must be of the finest and best grade of statuary marble, and must be equal in quality and workmanship to any in Statuary Hall in the Capitol at Washington, and at least equal in size to the one of Hon. James A. Garfield, lately placed therein by the state of Ohio." Coming as it did in the midst of a severe economic depression, the Marquette statue competition elicited a good deal of interest from aspiring American and European artists. Not all of those responding appeared to have strong qualifications. One such was the Pickel Marble and Granite Company of St. Louis, whose letterhead indicated that the firm specialized in "furniture, radiator and plumber tops, altars, headstones, monuments, and tombs."' Some sculptors requested the commission to send a photograph or give particulars about Marquette's height, weight, dress, etc., to which Secretary La Follette invariably responded, "There are no pictures of Marquette in existence and, of course, artists must depend upon their own conception for figure and features, each having the same opportunity to learn the facts of his life from history." Helen F. Mears, a twenty-two-year-old Oshkosh resident, entered a model which she described as of "the pious and gentle Marquette, clothed in the habit of his order, gazing for the first time over the broad expanse of the Mississippi." By the time of its October 15 deadline, the commission had received fourteen proposals, though two included neither the name of the artist nor a bid. Several others arrived before the final decision three weeks later. The models varied considerably in artistic conception and quality, to say nothing of price, which ranged from $4,000 to $10,000. None of the best-known American sculptors had bothered to enter the competition, however. Indeed, one had warned the commission that this "is always an unsatisfactory way of getting a design, resulting almost invariably, in a lot of bad ones, for the reason that no sculptor of ability has time to compete in that way." The art critic of the Milwaukee Sentinel, Edwin C. Eldridge, expressed great disappointment at the motley collection, "there being but few of them," he said, "at all worthy of serious consideration." Typical of Eldridge's disdainful reaction was his complaint that Chicago sculptor Leopold Bracony, by presenting the figure of a pious and reflective philosopher, had "made a solemn fool of Pere Marquette, absolutely foreign to the subject in question." Eldridge's favorite was the model by Gaetano Trentanove, a Florentine sculptor known to Milwaukeeans for his busts of such prominent residents as Matthew H. Carpenter and William E. Cramer, the former now in the possession of the State Historical Society and the latter belonging to Marquette University. The commission members evidently agreed with this assessment, for on November 7, 1894, they unanimously decided to award the contract to Signor Trentanove, who thereupon departed for northern Wisconsin to become more familiar with the subject by visiting some Indian reservations. Ironically, although both the Trentanove and Bracony models subsequently came to the Historical Society, it is the pensive Bracony model — the one art critic Eldridge considered "a solemn fool" — that the Museum staff currently favors enough to put on display, relegating the winning Trentanove model to storage! |
« Fotografie - Dührkoop, Rudolf (1848-1918) und Minya Diez-Dührkoop (1873-1929) Porträt Leopold Bracony. Platindruck. Auf dem großen Japanbogen handschriftlich signiert "R. u. M. Dührkoop", verso auf dem O.-Unterlagenblatt bezeichnet u. "No 42 / Portrait of the sculptur Bracony / 1909", Stempel "Landeskunstschule Hamburg 24 / Ausgeschieden", u.l. Stempel "Rudolf Dührkoop / Hamburg / Jungfernstieg 34.", Im Druck u.r.mit Trockenstempel "Dührkoop", verso bezeichnet "II/89740 b". Auf Japanpapier und Karton zweifach original-montiert, 22,1 x 16,7 cm (Bildmaß), 41,2 x 31 cm (Blattmaß) Porträt des Bildhauers Leopold Bracony (ca.1840-1926) als Brustbild in Vorderansicht. Der Skulpteur stützt nachdenklich den Kopf in die Hand. Der Fokus liegt auf seinem Gesicht und der Hand, die im Gegensatz zu den umliegenden Partien in voller Tiefenschärfe erscheinen. Minya Dührkoop begann 14 jährig als Assistentin im Atelier ihres Vaters Rudolf D. zu arbeiten. Seit Rudolf Dührkoop um 1900 zwei Filialen in Berlin eröffnete, betrieb sie selbständig das Hamburger Studio. Ihre Kunstfotografien vertraten den pictorialistischen Stil, der mittels verringerter Konturenschärfe und einer zerstreuten Lichtführung malerische Qualitäten hervorbrachte [web ou pdf]. » |
![]() |
New York Times, December 31, 1905 (collaboration from Lea Stefancova) A Bird of Passage The Sculptor Bracony Pitches His Artistic Tent in New York for the Winter.
|